Last Updated: February 10, 2025
On January 17th, 2025, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals (“Court”) issued its latest decision in the ongoing DACA litigation. While nothing has changed, and current DACA recipients can continue to renew their DACA and obtain both protection from deportation and work authorization, it is important to understand what the current state of DACA is and what can change in the future.
What does the Court decision say?
The Court ruled that certain aspects of the DACA rule, particularly the federal government's authority to grant work authorization, was unlawful. However, the Court acknowledged that the federal government retains the power to grant deferred action, providing protection from deportation. While the case is still pending, the Court has decided to pause its decision, meaning everything remains the same for now for DACA holders.
Does DACA protect me from deportation, and what should I do if I encounter an immigration officer?
Yes, a current and valid grant of deferred action protects you from deportation. Remember, if you encounter an immigration official, you have the right to assert your constitutional rights and remain silent. You do not have to present any documentation to them or respond to their questions.
If they are attempting to detain you, remember that you are protected from deportation during the validity of your deferred action. You can inform them of your DACA status and carry a copy of your current DACA approval or work permit as proof. However, it's essential to stay informed about any updates to DACA policies.
Who can renew and when should they renew?
Currently, only DACA recipients who have a valid grant of DACA or whose DACA expired less than a year ago can renew their DACA.
When should they submit their renewal?
-
If your DACA expires in less than six months: File to renew as soon as possible!
-
If your DACA expires within 6 months to a year: Consider renewing now. USCIS is currently accepting early DACA renewals.
-
NOTE: DACA renewals are granted from date of approval, not from the date of the prior DACA grant expiring. This means that some may lose weeks or months from their current DACA depending on when the renewal is granted and when their current DACA expires. Speak to a trusted legal service provider to discuss the benefits of renewing early.
-
If your DACA expires more than 1 year from today: It may not be worth renewing now. Speak to a trusted legal service provider to understand your options. If you renew too early, it might not gain you a lot of time on your DACA. USCIS will grant your DACA from the date of approval not from the time of expiration.
Can people who never had DACA or whose DACA expired more than a year ago apply?
Unfortunately, initial DACA requests are not being granted right now. This includes DACA requests from people who have never had DACA and from people whose DACA has been expired for more than a year. Current USCIS guidance treats DACAs that expired more than a year ago as initial DACA request, which are not being granted at this moment.
Is advance parole still available for DACA recipients?
Currently advance parole is available for DACA recipients who have a reason to travel for humanitarian, employment, or educational reasons. Although the Trump administration issued an executive order to more heavily scrutinize other parole programs, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) released guidance confirming that advance parole for DACA recipients remains unaffected by the executive order. This was confirmed during a recent local San Francisco CBP meeting. However, it is highly recommended that DACA recipients speak and work with a legal service provider before applying and traveling on advance parole in case policies change while the person is abroad.
As of now, access to DACA advance parole remains an option, and DACA recipients have been approved for advance parole and have been able to return successfully during the first few weeks of the Trump administration, but this could change in the future.
To ensure DACA recipients are prepared to travel and access advance parole, it is recommended that they:
-
Consult with a legal service provider before leaving the country, even if they have already been approved for advance parole, especially if a person has a removal (deportation order), arrests, or other complex issues.
-
ALERT: It is important to discuss the impact that any arrests or convictions can have on someone seeking to travel in light of the Laken Riley Act. If you have been charged with, arrested for, convicted of, or have admitted committing an act with elements of burglary, theft, larceny, shoplifting, assault of a law enfacement officer offense, or any crime that resulted in the death or serious bodily injury to another, consider not traveling.
-
Work with their legal representative to request advance parole and to prepare documents for travel, which should include the representative’s contact information in case it is needed.
-
Prepare to be sent to secondary inspection upon return. This is a normal process whereby DACA recipients are likely to be sent to secondary inspection upon re-entry for CBP to verify the validity of the advance parole. For more information on secondary inspection and how to prepare, see ILRC’s Preparing for Re-Entry After Traveling on Advance Parole guide.
-
Seek emergency advance parole, if possible. Emergency advance parole is available to those who have an urgent or critical need to travel abroad within 15 days from the date of their advance parole application. This will allow DACA recipients to obtain a decision of their advance parole application more quickly instead of waiting months. For more information on emergency advance parole and how you can request it, see Informed Immigrant’s guide.
As noted, for now, DACA recipients can continue to seek advance parole but should first consult with a trusted legal representative to discuss the benefits and risks of using advance parole under the Trump administration.
What changes can the Trump administration make to DACA and advance parole?
While we’re unable to predict the future, advocates believe that because of the pending litigation, it is not expected that the Trump administration will make any changes to the DACA program or advance parole requests until the litigation is resolved. It is expected that the Trump administration will wait for a decision from the court before making any official changes to DACA.
While the general access to DACA and advance parole has not changed, USCIS, under the Trump administration, could take actions that can affect DACA recipients. For example:
-
Application processing may slow DACA renewal and advance parole processing;
-
There may be more scrutiny for DACA recipients who travel on advance parole and have arrests, deportation orders, or other serious immigration violations; or
-
There may be an increase in requests for evidence for advance parole because adjudicators are instructed to find reasons to deny applications.
These changes have not happened and may never happen but, given the rapid changes that are occurring in immigration now, it is important to stay informed and connect with a trusted legal service provider to understand any changes or announcements and their impact on your case.
i. This Community Alert was produced in partnership with the Cornell Law School Path2Papers Project.
What is the DACA Rule and How Does it Impact Me?
On August 30, 2022, the Biden Administration issued a new rule on Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) that will incorporate DACA into the Federal Regulations. Since its announcement, several questions have been raised around who can access DACA now and what it means for all those first-time applicants who are waiting to obtain DACA. This community resource outlines key points for you to keep in mind as you navigate access to DACA now and when the rule goes into effect on October 31, 2022.
How to Complete a DACA Renewal
This video details how to complete a DACA renewal application packet by walking through the various forms’ questions to highlight what they mean and focus on areas worth paying close attention to. As always, we highly encourage applicants to seek a consultation with a trusted legal service provider before submitting their packets. Namely this is so applicants can ensure they are submitting their information as accurately as possible and addressing the dimensions of their specific case that may or may not allow them to be eligible for other forms of immigration relief. In this one-hour walkthrough video, the ILRC’s Legal Outreach Coordinator, Abraham Bedoy, dives deep into each form required for a renewal so those taking on their own application packet (forms: I-821D, I-765, I-765WS, G-1145) can follow along to double-check their entries.
Persons are barred from receiving or renewing DACA if they have been convicted of a felony, a significant misdemeanor, three or more misdemeanors, or otherwise pose a threat to national security or public safety. DACA applicants who have been arrested or convicted of a crime may still be eligible, but they should first obtain their criminal records and take them to an expert immigration practitioner to obtain legal advice about their eligibility and potential risks of applying. This resource provides persons applying for DACA with instructions about what criminal records they need for their application and how they can find them.
Applicants must meet certain requirements to be eligible for DACA, including showing that they have been continuously residing in the United States since June 15, 2012. Acquiring documents to use as evidence to prove the continuous residence requirement can be tedious. As such, this resource focuses on the types of evidence initial DACA applicants can gather to prove continuous residence and where applicants can get this evidence.
2021 Burton Awards Sponsorships
This year, we hope you will join a community of like-minded supporters and advocates by sponsoring the 2021 Burton Awards. All sponsorships for the 2021 Burton Awards are fully tax-deductible, as allowed by law. The ILRC truly appreciates your support of our online event. Your investment in our work allows us to help immigrants and their families stay together in this country and thrive.
You can also make a donation to our event by selecting a predesignated donation level or by entering an amount in the "Additional Donation" box.
All 2021 Burton Awards sponsorship levels include the following two benefits:
- Newsletter & Annual Report recognition
- Recognition in social media, email, and press releases as listing (Pinnacle and Premiere levels include company logo in press releases)
If you have any questions about the sponsorship levels or benefits, please contact Cynthia Tirado Housel, Director of Leadership Giving, at chousel@ilrc.org.
Additional Benefits by Level Include:
Pinnacle
$25,000
Website recognition with logo and company website hyperlink for 6 months
Opportunity to record a 30 second video for the event webpage. Your video can be used to congratulate our honorees, share why you support the ILRC, or to advocate for fairer and more just immigrant rights.*
Premiere
$15,000
Website recognition with logo and company website hyperlink for 4 months
Opportunity to record a 30 second video for the event webpage. Your video can be used to congratulate our honorees, share why you support the ILRC, or to advocate for fairer and more just immigrant rights.*
Champion
$10,000
Website recognition with logo and company website hyperlink for 2 months
Opportunity to record a 30 second video for the event webpage. Your video can be used to congratulate our honorees, share why you support the ILRC, or to advocate for fairer and more just immigrant rights.*
Major
$7,000
Website recognition with logo
Leader
$5,000
Website recognition as listing
Spirit
$5,000
Website recognition as listing
Patron
$3,500
Website recognition as listing
Nonprofit Partner
$1,200
Website recognition as listing
*All videos are subject to approval by the ILRC prior to upload and may be edited for time or content.
Welcome to Our Virtual Burton Awards
The Immigrant Legal Resource Center has moved the annual Phillip Burton Immigration & Civil Rights Awards celebration online again this year continue to keep us all safe during the pandemic. We are creating a virtual experience for you to enjoy. There will be special content from our staff and board as well as recognition of our generous event sponsors.
Hosted by Thuy Vu
Seven-time Emmy Award winning journalist and Co-Founder and President of Global Mentor Network
We are proud announce the honorees of the 2021 Burton Awards:
Congresswoman Sylvia R. Garcia
Representing the 29th District of Texas
Recipient of the 2021 Nancy Pelosi Award for Policy
Crista Ramos
Lead Plaintiff in federal lawsuit, Ramos v. Wolf, a suit to protect Temporary Protected Status holders
Recipient of the 2021 Phillip Burton Award for Advocacy
New American Campaign’s Founding Funders
Recipients of the 2021 Phillip Burton Award for Immigration & Civil Rights
Frontline Heroes Award
In these uncertain times, one thing has been laid bare—immigrants are essential. From securing our nation’s food supply to providing life-saving healthcare services, immigrants have been, and continue to be, instrumental in keeping the critical infrastructure of our society running.
In light of the extraordinary circumstances we are living through, the ILRC created the Frontline Heroes Award to lift-up the collective service and sacrifice of all the Immigrant Essential Workers. We are pleased to introduce you to two honorees who are accepting this award on behalf of all the unsung frontline heroes.
Double Your Gift Today
The Burton Awards event is not just a gathering for friends and colleagues. It is the ILRC’s biggest fundraiser of the year. The money that we raise is critical to our ability to advocate for a bold new vision for what immigrant rights and immigration policy should be that advances the ILRC’s mission to build a democratic society that values diversity and the rights of all people.
Your donation—at all levels—will make an immediate difference in the ILRC’s ability to continue its high-impact education and advocacy. It also helps us pivot, when needed, to address new challenges or threats to immigrants and their families.
Because proceeds from the Burton Awards are imperative to our work, the ILRC’s Board of Directors has established a matching fund for all gifts made between now and July 31st. For every dollar raised, our board will generously match your contribution on a one-to-one basis—up to $43,000! That means your gift of $100 grows to $200 and makes double the impact in sustaining the work of our talented staff team.
Of course, all contributions are fully tax-deductible to the extent allowed by law and we will be delighted to add your name to our donor list.
2021 Burton Awards Sponsorships
This year, we hope you will join a community of like-minded supporters and advocates by sponsoring the 2021 Burton Awards. All sponsorships for the 2021 Burton Awards are fully tax-deductible, as allowed by law. The ILRC truly appreciates your support of our online event. Your investment in our work allows us to help immigrants and their families stay together in this country and thrive.
You can also make a donation to our event by selecting a predesignated donation level or by entering an amount in the "Additional Donation" box.
All 2021 Burton Awards sponsorship levels include the following two benefits:
- Newsletter & Annual Report recognition
- Recognition in social media, email, and press releases as listing (Pinnacle and Premiere levels include company logo in press releases)
If you have any questions about the sponsorship levels or benefits, please contact Cynthia Tirado Housel, Director of Leadership Giving, at chousel@ilrc.org.
Additional Benefits by Level Include:
Pinnacle
$25,000
Website recognition with logo and company website hyperlink for 6 months
Opportunity to record a 30 second video for the event webpage. Your video can be used to congratulate our honorees, share why you support the ILRC, or to advocate for fairer and more just immigrant rights.*
Premiere
$15,000
Website recognition with logo and company website hyperlink for 4 months
Opportunity to record a 30 second video for the event webpage. Your video can be used to congratulate our honorees, share why you support the ILRC, or to advocate for fairer and more just immigrant rights.*
Champion
$10,000
Website recognition with logo and company website hyperlink for 2 months
Opportunity to record a 30 second video for the event webpage. Your video can be used to congratulate our honorees, share why you support the ILRC, or to advocate for fairer and more just immigrant rights.*
Major
$7,000
Website recognition with logo
Leader
$5,000
Website recognition as listing
Spirit
$5,000
Website recognition as listing
Patron
$3,500
Website recognition as listing
Nonprofit Partner
$1,200
Website recognition as listing
*All videos are subject to approval by the ILRC prior to upload and may be edited for time or content.
In the first of a three-part Immigration Issues Explored series, ILRC Founder and General Counsel, Bill Ong Hing facilitated a conversation with staff attorney and immigrant-youth specialist, Rachel Prandini on the state of immigrants seeking asylum at the southern border, how the Biden Administration is continuing the inhuman treatment of asylees and what the ILRC is doing to push back.
Thank you to all of our donors and supporters who make the Immigration Issues Explored series possible.
To access this webinar, click here and enter the following password when prompted: &A9ADzex
The Higher Education Legal Services Project is a California-funded effort to provide FREE immigration legal services to students enrolled in the California Community College & California State University systems. This unprecedented project brings together trusted and reputable legal services providers to offer direct legal support to immigrant college students so they can best assess their unique case and plan for their future.
Partner organizations offer pro bono immigration consultations and case support on campus and/or online to any enrolled students – whether they are full time, part time, or they are taking non-credit courses, dual enrollment, and adult education courses.
The support includes a wide range of services including, but not limited to, screening for different forms of relief, DACA renewals, family-based petitions, citizenship/naturalization requests, and more. Students attending California Community Colleges are also eligible to have their DACA fees covered under this program. Faculty and staff at California Community Colleges are also eligible for free immigration legal services under this project. Select the option that applies to you below to be routed to the legal services page for your respective school system.
I am enrolled in a:
Help us spread the word:

Fighting Injustices
Join the Immigrant Legal Resource Center for the next in our 2021 Donor Conference Call series, Immigration Issues Explored. December’s topic is "Fighting Injustice” explored how the criminal legal system in Texas unjustly treats immigrants and drives deportations, and what strategies the ILRC employs to fight back.
The call was led ILRC’s Executive Director, Eric Cohen, in conversation with ILRC Senior Staff Attorney, Lena Graber, and Texas-based Staff Attorney, Anita Gupta.
Watch the recording here with passcode: Q^17zKcM
Resources:
- To view the “Justice for All?” Harris County Report: https://www.ilrc.org/HarrisCountyReport
- TX page: https://www.ilrc.org/texas
- Moving Texas Forward: https://www.ilrc.org/moving-texas-forward
- Article link re: Operation Lone Star investigation request – Castro, et al.: https://www.houstonpublicmedia.org/articles/news/politics/immigration/2021/10/29/412064/texas-congressman-joaquin-castro-signs-letter-urging-a-doj-probe-into-operation-lone-star/
Blueprint for the Biden Administration: Update
Join the ILRC’s Policy Director, Sameera Hafiz, and ILRC Legal Program Director, Alison Kamhi, as we revisit the policy recommendations put forth in our Blueprint for the Biden Administration. What progress has been made in the last year? Where do we go from here?
Thank you to all of our donors and supporters who make the Immigration Issues Explored series possible.
Thanks again for attending the ILRC donor conference call, Blueprint for the Biden Administration: One Year Update. We wanted to follow up in response to a few questions we received during the call for more information
-
- Naturalization: During the call, ILRC discussed advocacy with USCIS to increase access to disability waivers for green card holders applying to naturalize. USCIS proposed welcome changes to Form N-648, Medical Certification for Disability Exceptions, to simplify and streamline the process to make it easier for disabled green card holders to obtain citizenship, but these changes have not yet been implemented. Please see the following advocacy letter regarding the proposed revisions (Nov. 2021): https://www.ilrc.org/advocacy-comment-n-648-naturalization-disability.
- TPS: ILRC discussed the increased use of temporary protected status (TPS) as protection for vulnerable populations during the Biden Administration. We were pleased to see the announcement on March 16 that Afghanistan has been designated for TPS, which will help protect Afghan nationals in the United States from returning to unsafe conditions in Afghanistan: https://www.uscis.gov/newsroom/news-releases/secretary-mayorkas-designates-afghanistan-for-temporary-protected-status.
Updated November 8, 2024
Although immigration law is federal law, administered by federal agencies, it is state laws and state-powered machinery that drive immigration enforcement. Since the creation of the ‘Secure Communities’ program, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is automatically notified of every person taken into custody across the country – no matter on what basis, or pretext, they were arrested. This gives local law enforcement tremendous power to drive immigration enforcement. Over the last decade, 70-75% of ICE arrests in the interior of the U.S. have been handoffs from another law enforcement agency, be it a local or state jail or federal prison. It is therefore states, and their internal law enforcement and criminal legal systems, that power the mass detention and mass deportation system.
Once Donald Trump is inaugurated and becomes the next President of the U.S., he has promised to dedicate massive federal resources to rounding up and deporting immigrants, with raids and sweeps in immigrant communities, especially ‘sanctuary cities.’ But whether he unleashes the National Guard or invokes the Alien Enemies Act or any of the other horrific measures his campaign has touted, the majority of people shunted into the deportation system will continue to be sent there from state and local law enforcement. That is the engine of the system that ICE has built over the last two decades, and on which the Trump administration’s goals rest. Moreover, some states have aggressively expanded this engine with their own laws. Texas, for example, has already converted substantial portions of its criminal legal system to primarily focus on immigration enforcement issues. 2024, in particular, has seen several states invent new ways to weaponize their state criminal laws against immigrants. These states and their anti-immigrant political agenda will be further empowered once Trump becomes President again.
Meanwhile, most “blue” states, including states with some pro-immigrant state laws, do not actually have meaningful safeguards against a potential fascist and virulently anti-immigrant federal administration. Only Oregon and Illinois have comprehensive state laws restricting transfers of people to ICE; a few other states have substantial limitations, but still affirmatively transfer many immigrants directly from state and local officials to immigration detention. Most regions of the country where popular opinion is generally supportive of immigrants are nonetheless operating in a legal regime that materially supports mass detention and deportation. This map is an urgent call to action for elected officials who oppose the mass deportation agenda to take action and defend immigrant communities. We still have power to slow the gears of mass deportation.
For larger version of the map, click here.
The map represents the degree to which state policies limit or expand involvement in immigration enforcement, based on an analysis of current state laws and any litigation impacting state laws, as well as our own expertise in state and local laws and policies relating to immigration enforcement. It shows which states have gone the furthest in passing legislation that protects their communities, which have made significant steps, which have done nothing, which have prevented their localities from taking protective measures, and which have actively passed laws to collude with ICE in ways that significantly harm their residents.
We update the map regularly as the laws shift and grow.
Some states are clear leaders in offering protections for their immigrant residents and residents of color that are disproportionately harmed by biased policing, imprisonment, and deportation. States that have not enacted any laws regarding immigration enforcement are nonetheless often providing unnecessary, sometimes illegal and unconstitutional, assistance to ICE. Some states have gone to the other extreme, placing their communities at risk. They have passed laws punishing their own localities for passing sanctuary policies and undermined the impact of these protective policies. Some have also passed even more expansive, discriminatory and harmful policies that attempt to force state and local law enforcement to essentially become a de facto arm of the federal detention and deportation system. While some aspects of these policies have been struck down by federal courts and many are currently being litigated, others remain.
Despite the anti-immigrant fervor gripping many states and driving ever more punitive state law endeavors, more foreign-born residents are impacted by states with protective laws (23 million people) vs states with harmful laws (15 million people), with 17 million people residing in states that have passed no laws on immigration enforcement.
Explanation of Methodology and Legend
For this map, we analyzed 50 states and the District of Columbia for state sanctuary-related laws across 20 parameters. These parameters fell into five general categories: information and resource sharing with ICE, jail-to-ICE transfers, patrol officer collusion with ICE, contracts with ICE or U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and state criminalization laws. For explanation of these categories and the individual parameters, see the Appendix. States were given a numerical score ranging from 1-5 for each parameter, with “1” the most harmful and “5” the most protective. We also analyzed how litigation has changed the impact of state legislation. States that had passed laws that would have given them a score of “1” for most harmful were changed to “2” or somewhat harmful where successful litigation resulted in striking down or mitigating the harmful impact of the legislation. Where state laws simply reiterated federal laws that harm immigrants, we also gave them a “2” or somewhat harmful designation. We distinguish between state laws that require affirmative participation in immigration enforcement from those that preempt local sanctuary policies but do not mandate particular action. On the pro-sanctuary side, states that passed strong protective policies were given a “5” as most protective; those that had significant carve-outs or exceptions to these policies were given a “4” as somewhat protective. States that have no legislation or didn’t address a specific parameter were given a not applicable (“n/a”) score of “3”.
When averaged across all the parameters, two states had particularly strong and comprehensive laws protecting immigrants, and fell into the most protective category: Oregon and Illinois. Three other states also have fairly broad sanctuary statutes: California, New Jersey and Washington. Washington. Colorado, Connecticut, Maryland and Vermont have also enacted some protections against their involvement in immigration enforcement. New York and Rhode Island have taken some small steps toward reducing immigration enforcement. On the other side, many states have enacted laws mandating some level of participation in immigration enforcement by local agencies: Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, and South Carolina. Two states have broad anti-sanctuary laws with significant negative effects for their immigrant residents: Alabama and Tennessee. Five states have particularly aggressive and comprehensive anti-sanctuary laws that force local agencies to be significantly involved in deporting their constituents: Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Texas and West Virginia. Although a number of these anti-sanctuary laws have been sharply limited by federal court decisions, many of their impacts remain in effect. In 2024, several states added new laws creating state deportation mechanisms and crimes defined entirely around being an undocumented immigrant present or entering the state, although these laws are for the time being held up in federal courts: Iowa, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Texas.
The focus of this map is on state legislation, rather than executive orders, court decisions unrelated to litigation, or other non-legislative policies. We made two exceptions for New Jersey and Rhode Island. Because the New Jersey Constitution and its Criminal Justice Act provide for the Attorney General to direct all law enforcement and prosecuting agencies operating under the authority of the laws of the state, the Attorney General Law Enforcement Directive has expansive impact akin to legislation and was treated as such in our map. Rhode Island operates a unified correctional system whereby the Governor’s Executive Order directing its Department of Corrections impacts the only jail and prison in the state and was also treated as akin to legislation.
The map does not include or analyze immigration-related state laws that are not focused on immigration enforcement, such as funds for immigration legal services, access to drivers’ licenses for undocumented immigrants, in-state tuition for undocumented students, state benefits afforded to non-citizens, etc.
The Impacts of State Immigration Laws
The different state law regimes can determine results in real people’s lives, but they are just a rough approximation that does not speak to the broader impacts of these policies, nor to how carefully the laws are actually followed. Overpolicing of communities of color and vulnerable populations undermines safety for immigrants in sanctuary and non-sanctuary jurisdictions alike. But when local law enforcement agencies are not involved in deportations, immigrant communities are better integrated, more secure, and more involved. Their children are less likely to live in fear of losing a parent, mental health is improved, and access to justice is protected, while crime rates continue to fall. Until our federal lawmakers gather the political will to end the tyranny of our detention and deportation machine, the ILRC will continue to advise advocates, law enforcement, and elected officials across the nation on how to enact and improve sanctuary policies to protect our communities.
Further Background
Local involvement in immigration enforcement makes local agencies the gateway to deportation, co-opts local resources into questionable, racially discriminatory purposes, strips communities of any sense of safety, and undermines the rule of law.
There is no federal legal obligation for state and local jurisdictions to use their resources to help with immigration enforcement. But historically police and sheriff’s departments have often voluntarily assisted ICE, without even considering the legality or ramifications of their actions.
Following widespread advocacy and federal court rulings that ICE detainers (requests to have an individual held for transfer directly from local custody to immigration detention) are unconstitutional, hundreds of counties and cities stopped complying with these requests. And many have gone much further in shielding their local resources from entanglement in immigration enforcement. However, the majority of counties have still not caught on to the legal jeopardy they face by complying with ICE detainers, nor recognized the horrific implications for their immigrant residents. ILRC maintains a map of county-level policies on involvement with ICE here: www.ilrc.org/local-enforcement-map.
Amidst the controversy over Secure Communities and the refusal of many localities to transfer their residents to ICE, some politicians and pundits began using sanctuary policies as a scapegoat for all of society’s ills. Trump made attacking sanctuary policies one of the cornerstones of his 2016 campaign and a key domestic policy priority for his administration. Prior to Trump, Arizona and a few other copycat states passed expansive “show me your papers” anti-sanctuary legislation, essentially forcing its state and local law enforcement to act as an arm of federal immigration enforcement (which even the federal government at the time opposed). While the Supreme Court and other federal courts have struck down many of the unconstitutional aspects of these laws, other insidious provisions remained. More recent waves of anti-sanctuary legislation have skirted the provisions originally struck down by the courts, but added new harmful measures restricting localities from passing sanctuary policies and increasing other aspects of collusion between state and local law enforcement and ICE.
At the same time, states like California and Washington led the way on enacting protective laws, and more recently, Illinois and Oregon have shown what truly expansive protective policies can offer their residents. At the ILRC, we have seen tremendous success of sanctuary policies that disentangle local law enforcement from ICE, and we continue to craft, support, and advocate for those initiatives nationwide.
For press inquiries about this map, ILRC’s reports on sanctuary policies, or other ILRC information about immigration enforcement, contact Donna De La Cruz at media@ilrc.org. For more information about data underlying the map or assistance in starting a local campaign or joining national efforts, contact Lena Graber at lgraber@ilrc.org.
Additional Resources
For information on policies specific to local entanglement with ICE, see our map. For more details about policies regarding immigration enforcement and analysis of what our maps mean, see our reports reviewing the nature and expansion of sanctuary policies across the country: Growing the Resistance (2019); The Rise of Sanctuary (2018); and Searching for Sanctuary (2017).